In a dramatic last-minute twist, Susanta Nath, Chairman of the Odisha Police Recruitment Board (OPRB), cancelled a highly anticipated press conference on Thursday afternoon, leaving journalists and anxious candidates in the lurch amid the ongoing controversy surrounding the Sub-Inspector (SI) recruitment exam.
The event was scheduled for around 4:30 PM, with an official notification circulated from Nath’s office as early as 11:30 AM. Media personnel and stakeholders had gathered with bated breath, expecting crucial updates on the flawed examination process that had sparked widespread outrage and protests. However, in a shocking turn, the conference was abruptly called off without any prior indication, fueling further speculation and frustration.
No official explanation has been provided for the sudden cancellation, despite repeated inquiries. Sources close to the board described the move as “unexpected,” while journalists on the ground expressed dismay over the lack of transparency at a time when clarity is desperately needed.
Addressing the simmering tensions in a brief statement released afterwards, Nath urged all SI aspirants to exercise patience and restraint. “I advise all candidates to remain steadfast and await further developments,” he said. He assured that the recruitment process would be expedited “as soon as possible” by adhering to due procedures, emphasising the board’s commitment to fairness.
The controversy stems from alleged irregularities in the SI recruitment exam, which has been mired in disputes over question paper leaks, unfair evaluation, and procedural lapses. The Odisha Crime Branch has launched a full-scale investigation into the matter, with Nath vowing “strict legal action against all individuals involved, in accordance with the law.”
As the probe unfolds, thousands of young hopefuls across the state continue to demand justice and a re-examination.
The OPRB’s decision to pull the plug on the presser has only amplified calls for accountability, with opposition leaders and student unions criticising the board for evading public scrutiny.
