Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai has raised concern over how oral observations made by judges during court proceedings are sometimes misinterpreted or taken out of context on social media platforms.
His remarks followed an incident on Monday when a lawyer attempted to throw an object inside the Supreme Court. The individual was immediately stopped by security officials, and no one was harmed.
‘We Don’t Know What Will Be Reported’
CJI Gavai shared an example involving Justice K Vinod Chandran, mentioning that he had once advised his colleague to refrain from making a remark during a hearing to prevent it from being misunderstood online.
“My learned brother, Justice K Vinod Chandran, had something to say. I stopped him when we were hearing the Dheeraj Mor case. On social media, we do not know how things may be interpreted. I requested him to say it privately,” the CJI explained.
The observation came during a hearing filed by the All India Judges Association concerning service conditions, pay scales, and promotions of judicial officers. The bench, comprising the CJI and Justice Chandran, has referred the matter to a five-judge bench for further consideration.
Incident Inside the Supreme Court
On Monday, an individual in the courtroom attempted to throw a shoe toward the CJI. The person was quickly restrained, and the situation remained under control.
Reports suggest the act was linked to remarks made during an earlier hearing regarding the restoration of a Lord Vishnu idol at the Khajuraho complex in Madhya Pradesh.
Remaining composed, the CJI asked the court staff and security team to let the person go after issuing a warning.
“Please do not get distracted by this. Such incidents do not affect us,” CJI Gavai told those present before continuing with the day’s proceedings.
Clarification on Previous Remarks
Earlier, CJI Gavai had dismissed a petition related to the Khajuraho temple as a “publicity interest litigation.” During the hearing, he had commented humorously, “If you are a strong devotee of Lord Vishnu, then you can pray or meditate.”
After some social media posts misrepresented his statement, the CJI clarified his intent, emphasizing respect for all faiths.
“I was informed that my earlier comments were portrayed differently online. I want to make it clear that I respect all religions equally,” the CJI stated.
Responsible Communication and Judicial Dignity
The incident has reignited discussions about the impact of social media on judicial proceedings and the importance of responsible digital communication.
Legal experts highlight the need for contextual reporting and fact-based dialogue to ensure that judicial remarks are understood accurately and respectfully.
CJI Gavai’s message underscores the balance between freedom of expression and the responsibility to maintain trust in judicial institutions.
