• About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact
Sunday, June 1, 2025
Pragativadi I Latest Odisha News in English I Breaking News
  • Epaper
  • Odisha
  • Twin City
  • National
  • World
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
No Result
View All Result
  • Epaper
  • Odisha
  • Twin City
  • National
  • World
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
No Result
View All Result
Pragativadi I Latest Odisha News in English I Breaking News
No Result
View All Result

Home » Centre opposes lifetime disqualification of convicted lawmakers

Centre opposes lifetime disqualification of convicted lawmakers

Ananya Pattnaik by Ananya Pattnaik
February 26, 2025
in National
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
0
Lawmakers
0
SHARES
9
VIEWS

The Union government has opposed a plea seeking a lifetime ban on convicted lawmakers from contesting elections, asserting before the Supreme Court that there is “nothing inherently unconstitutional in limiting the effect of penalties by time” to ensure deterrence while avoiding “undue harshness”.


Defending the existing legal provisions that limit the disqualification of convicted legislators to six years after completing their jail time, the Centre, in an affidavit submitted before the top court, argued that the impugned provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, are based on the principles of “proportionality and reasonability”, and that Parliament, as the exclusive lawmaking authority, has the discretion to decide the period of disqualification or penalties for convicted lawmakers.

“The disqualifications made under the impugned sections are limited by time as a matter of parliamentary policy, and it would not be appropriate to substitute the Petitioner’s understanding of the issue and impose a lifetime ban,” the affidavit, filed by the Union law ministry on Tuesday, said.

Responding to a public interest litigation (PIL) by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay, the affidavit said: “The relief that the petitioner is seeking amounts to rewriting of the provision as it effectively seeks to read ‘life-long’ instead of ‘six years’ in all sub-sections of Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.”

The affidavit was filed in response to a February 10 order by a Supreme Court bench, led by justice Dipankar Datta, which questioned the rationale behind restricting the disqualification period to six years, observing that there exists an “apparent conflict of interest” in allowing a law-breaker to be a lawmaker. The court was hearing the PIL filed in 2016 by Upadhyay, challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 8 and 9 of the Act and seeking a lifetime ban on convicted legislators.

Section 8 disqualifies convicted legislators from contesting elections for six years after completing their sentence. It applies to a range of listed offenses and any conviction carrying a sentence of two or more years. Section 9 bars individuals dismissed from government service for corruption or disloyalty to the state from contesting elections for five years from the date of dismissal. Section 8 of the 1951 Act has been part of the law since its enactment.

The Centre’s affidavit emphasised that while the judiciary has the power to strike down unconstitutional legislation, courts cannot direct Parliament to frame or amend laws in a particular manner.

“It is trite law that the Courts cannot direct Parliament to make a law or to legislate in a particular way,” the affidavit stated, citing the Supreme Court’s judgment in Madras Bar Association Vs Union of India (2021), which held that “the courts cannot direct the legislature to frame or enact a law in a particular manner”. The Centre also relied on the State of Himachal Pradesh vs Satpal Saini (2017) ruling, which underscored that policymaking is the domain of the executive and legislature, and courts cannot interfere with policy decisions unless they violate constitutional principles.

The affidavit further stressed that the issue of whether a lifetime ban should be imposed is a question solely within the domain of Parliament.

“As a matter of law, in imposing any penalty, Parliament seeks to maintain proportionality and reasonability. The petition fails to make the crucial distinction between the basis of disqualification and the effects of disqualification. While the basis remains unchanged as long as the conviction stands, the effect lasts for a fixed period of time,” the government argued.

The affidavit noted that time-limited penalties are a well-established principle across penal laws. “Post the serving of such penalty, a person is free to rejoin society and enjoy all other rights available to any individual. By confining the operation of the penalty to an appropriate length of time, deterrence is ensured while undue harshness is avoided.”

The government also dismissed the petitioner’s reliance on Articles 102 and 191 of the Constitution, which deal with the disqualification of legislators.

“These provisions are enabling provisions that confer power on Parliament to make laws governing disqualification. The Constitution has left the field open for Parliament to enact further laws as deemed fit, including determining both the grounds and duration of disqualification,” the affidavit said.

It pointed out that the other grounds for disqualification under Articles 102 and 191— such as holding an office of profit, unsoundness of mind, insolvency, and not being a citizen of India — are not permanent in nature and cease to exist once the disqualifying condition is resolved.

The court is set to take up the matter on March 4, with attorney general R Venkataramani expected to assist in the case. During the last hearing, the Supreme Court also directed the Election Commission to clarify its stance on the issue, remarking that “criminalisation of politics is a major issue”.

During the February 10 hearing, the court noted the alarming number of pending criminal cases against lawmakers, with amicus curiae and senior advocate Vijay Hansaria informing the bench that more than 5,000 cases remain unresolved. Justice Manmohan, part of the two-judge bench, expressed concern over the lack of progress in special MP/MLA courts, recounting his visit to the Rouse Avenue court in Delhi where he found that the judge handling cases against legislators had “retired for the day”.

The court is also examining the implementation of its 2015 ruling in Public Interest Foundation vs Union of India, which directed that cases against MPs and MLAs be disposed of within a year through day-to-day trials. The bench has called for a comprehensive study to understand why cases against lawmakers continue to stagnate.

 

Tags: latest newsLawmakerssupreme court
Previous Post

Jos Buttler takes subtle dig at India playing the Champions Trophy in Dubai

Next Post

CPCB data claims Sangam fit for holy dip

Ananya Pattnaik

Ananya Pattnaik

Related Posts

Teesta River Tragedy
National

Teesta River Tragedy: Landslides in Sikkim’s Mangan Halts Search For Missing Odisha and WB Tourists

May 31, 2025
NIA chargesheets CPI(M) Naxals in Jharkhand
National

Crackdown on Naxal Operations: NIA Chargesheets Three CPI(M) Members

May 31, 2025
Development Projects in Bhopal
National

PM Modi Inaugurates, Lays Foundation of Multiple Development Projects in Bhopal

May 31, 2025
Next Post
Sangam water

CPCB data claims Sangam fit for holy dip

Indian Hockey Teams

Indian Hockey Teams Shine in Bhubaneswar Leg of FIH Pro League

Naval Anti-Ship Missile

DRDO, Indian Navy Successfully Test Fire First Naval Anti-Ship Missile Off Odisha Coast

Follow Us

Recommended

3nm Chip Design Centres

India’s First 3nm Chip Design Centres Unveiled in Noida and Bengaluru

3 weeks ago
Pm Modi

PM Modi dials Elon Musk, discusses tech collaborations 

1 month ago
Piyush Goyal

‘We don’t negotiate at gunpoint’: Piyush Goyal on ongoing India-US trade talks

2 months ago
Bhadrak RMC Fire

Fire Breaks Out at Bhadrak RMC Market Complex, Goods Worth Lakhs Destroyed

3 months ago

Instagram

    Please install/update and activate JNews Instagram plugin.

Highlights

Odisha Hikes Water Tariff by 10% for Industries and Businesses in 2025-26

Odisha Faces Dry Week Ahead as Monsoon Takes a Break!

Teesta River Tragedy: Landslides in Sikkim’s Mangan Halts Search For Missing Odisha and WB Tourists

Big Plans for IIMC Dhenkanal: Union I&B Secretary Assures Full Support for Growth!

Crime Ring Busted in Berhampur: 7 Hardcore Criminals Held, Firearms & Cash Seized

Woman Arrested for Burning Disabled Man Over Property Greed in Odisha’s Berhampur

Trending

Illegal Chromite Mining in Sukinda Valley
Odisha

Illegal Chromite Mining in Sukinda Valley: Ex-Minister Urges Odisha CM for Action

by Yajati Rout
June 1, 2025
0

In a strongly worded letter to Odisha Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi, former minister and Biju Janata...

Odisha revenue collection

Odisha Targets ₹95,000 Crore in Revenue from Mining and Commercial Taxes in 2025

June 1, 2025
First COVID-19 Death Odisha 2025

Odisha’s Bhubaneswar Reports First COVID-19 Death of 2025!

May 31, 2025
Water Tariff Hike Odisha 2025

Odisha Hikes Water Tariff by 10% for Industries and Businesses in 2025-26

May 31, 2025
Odisha weather update

Odisha Faces Dry Week Ahead as Monsoon Takes a Break!

May 31, 2025
Facebook Twitter Youtube RSS

ABOUT US

News, as it should be covered, has been the forte of Pragativadi over the years. And this has ensured a classy readership encompassing the who’s who of the state. The people who matter in Odisha, depend on Pragativadi. For opinion leaders, decision makers and people with surplus disposable income Pragativadi is a must.

Follow us on social media:

Blog

The Chinese smartphone upstarts taking on Apple and Samsung

by pragativadinewsservice
January 11, 2025
0

Presidential Train Now Available For Jakartans Traveling To Bandung

by pragativadinewsservice
January 10, 2025
0

News Calendar

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    

© 2025 Pragativadi

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Epaper
  • Odisha
  • Twin City
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • National
  • World
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel

© 2025 Pragativadi